Threads vs. Bluesky: Who’s Winning the Battle for Social Media’s Future?

Two new players have stepped onto the social media stage, each promising a fresh approach: Threads and Bluesky. Both emerged as alternatives to traditional platforms, attracting users looking for something different. But how do they compare, and which one is gaining more ground? Let’s break it down.

The Basics: What Sets Them Apart

Threads is Meta’s answer to text-based social media. Built as an extension of Instagram, it allows users to create and engage in conversations seamlessly. The platform benefits from Instagram’s massive user base, making it easy for people to sign up and get started without much friction.

Bluesky, on the other hand, was created by Jack Dorsey, co-founder of Twitter. Unlike Threads, which operates within Meta’s ecosystem, Bluesky is built on decentralized technology. This means users have more control over their experience, from choosing their own content algorithms to engaging in a community-driven environment without a single company dictating the rules.

The Numbers: Who’s Growing Faster?

Threads launched with explosive growth, hitting 100 million users within days of its release. However, engagement dipped after the initial rush, and while the platform has regained momentum, recent estimates put it at around 275 million monthly active users. Growth has been steady, but many users still treat it as an extension of Instagram rather than a primary social media platform.

Bluesky, despite its smaller scale, has been gaining traction quickly. The platform saw a surge in users following major shifts on X (formerly Twitter), surpassing 20 million users by November 2024. Reports suggest that at times, Bluesky has been adding up to a million new users per day. This rapid adoption shows a growing interest in decentralized social media, particularly among users looking for an alternative to corporate-controlled platforms.

User Experience and Community Engagement

Threads feels familiar to Instagram users, which is both a strength and a limitation. The interface is smooth, but some users feel it lacks the deeper engagement that made early Twitter successful. Conversations are often fleeting, and the content feed leans heavily toward mainstream discussions rather than niche or highly interactive communities.

Bluesky has cultivated a more intimate and engaged user base. The decentralized nature of the platform allows people to shape their experience in ways they can’t on Threads. Users can choose how content is curated and avoid the algorithmic manipulation seen on other platforms. Reports indicate that Bluesky users engage more frequently with posts, and some media outlets have found that referral traffic from Bluesky outperforms both Threads and X.

The Challenges Ahead

Threads still struggles with retention. While Meta continues refining the app, its long-term success depends on whether it can offer something truly distinct from Instagram. Bluesky, on the other hand, faces scaling challenges. Its rapid growth has put strain on its infrastructure, with some users reporting technical issues. Ensuring a smooth experience while maintaining its decentralized mission will be key to sustaining its momentum.

The Verdict

Threads leads in sheer numbers, but Bluesky is making waves with its community-driven approach. The future of both platforms will depend on how they evolve to meet user expectations. Will Threads carve out its own identity beyond Instagram? Can Bluesky scale effectively without losing its unique appeal? The competition is far from over.

If your brand is looking to navigate the changing social media landscape, SocialJack Media can help you craft a strategy that keeps you ahead of the curve. Contact us today to find out how.

‍